Amazon’s Big AI Toolbox, Bedrock, Might Be Getting a Makeover!
Hey everyone, John here! Today, we’re diving into some interesting news about Amazon’s AI world. You might have heard of Amazon Web Services, or AWS – they’re a huge part of the internet, providing the computer power for tons of websites and apps. Well, AWS has a special service called Amazon Bedrock, and it’s all about making powerful AI accessible to businesses. It looks like Bedrock might be in for some big changes soon, and we’re here to break down why, in a way that’s super easy to understand.
So, What Exactly IS Amazon Bedrock?
Imagine you want to build something amazing with AI – maybe an app that can write stories, or a helper that can answer customer questions super intelligently. Instead of building the super-smart AI brain from scratch (which is incredibly hard!), Amazon Bedrock gives companies a place to access and use pre-built AI “brains,” also known as models. It’s like a big toolbox full of different AI tools they can pick and choose from.
Lila: “Hi John! So, Bedrock is like a shop where companies can get different AI smarts to put into their products?”
John: “Exactly, Lila! Well put. It’s designed to make it easier for businesses to add impressive AI features without having to become AI experts themselves. But, like any popular tool, users are starting to ask for more, and other companies are offering different, sometimes shinier, tools.”
What are Customers Asking For? The Bedrock “Wish List”
It turns out that companies using Bedrock have a few things on their wish list, and these requests are putting a bit of pressure on Amazon to update Bedrock. Here’s what they’re saying:
- Missing Popular AI Brains: One of the most talked-about AI companies right now is OpenAI, the folks behind ChatGPT. Many businesses want to use OpenAI’s popular AI models directly within Bedrock, but they’re not currently available there.
- Better Tools for Building “AI Agents”: Companies don’t just want raw AI models; they want easy ways to build “AI agents.” Think of these as AI helpers that can perform tasks, make decisions, and interact more dynamically. Bedrock, some say, doesn’t have a smooth, all-in-one system for building these agents.
- Cost and Hassle: Because OpenAI’s models aren’t in Bedrock, companies that want to use them have to connect to OpenAI separately. This can lead to extra costs and complications.
Lila: “John, you mentioned ‘AI models’ and ‘OpenAI’s popular LLMs.’ What are LLMs?”
John: “Great question, Lila! ‘LLM’ stands for Large Language Model. Think of an LLM as a very, very smart computer program that has been trained on a massive amount of text and code. Because it’s ‘learned’ so much, it can understand what you type, write human-like text, answer questions, summarize things, and even write computer code. ChatGPT is a famous example of an application built on an LLM.”
Lila: “Okay, that makes sense! And what about when they ‘call OpenAI’s APIs separately’? What’s an API?”
John: “Another good one! An API, or Application Programming Interface, is like a messenger or a waiter in a restaurant. If a company wants its software to use a feature from another service (like an OpenAI model), it sends a request via the API. The API takes that request to the service, gets the response (like the AI-generated text), and brings it back. So, instead of having one waiter (Bedrock) for everything, they have to use a separate waiter (OpenAI’s API) for some things, which can be less convenient.”
Experts point out that using these separate APIs can also lead to other issues:
- Data Egress Fees: When data moves out of one service (like OpenAI) and into another (like AWS), there can be extra charges.
- Integration Overhead: It’s more work for developers to manage these separate connections.
- Latency: This means delays. Calling an outside service can sometimes be slower.
- Security Concerns: Sending data back and forth between different systems can sometimes raise security questions for big companies.
Lila: “What are ‘data egress fees,’ John? That sounds complicated.”
John: “It does, but think of it this way, Lila. Imagine AWS is like your main office building. If you need information from a special library across town (that’s OpenAI’s service), you have to send a courier. ‘Data egress fees’ are like paying a small fee each time that courier brings documents (your data results) from the special library back to your main office. It’s a charge for moving data out of one system and into another.”
Lila: “And ‘latency’? Is that like when my video call gets laggy?”
John: “Precisely! ‘Latency’ is just a technical term for a delay. If Bedrock has to go ‘outside’ to get information from another service, it can take a little longer for the answer to come back, just like a laggy video call. For businesses, even small delays can be a problem.”
More Than Just AI Brains: The Need for Better Tools
It seems Bedrock is facing what some call a “perception and tooling challenge.” While it offers a good selection of AI models (the “brains”), businesses are increasingly looking for more than just access to these raw models. They want complete toolkits that make it super easy to build actual AI applications.
Derek Ashmore, an AI expert, puts it well: “Enterprises are increasingly looking for more than just raw access to foundation models — they want frameworks that simplify building applications.” He points out that Bedrock is a bit behind in offering higher-level tools for things like:
- Agent Orchestration: Tools to help manage and coordinate multiple AI agents working together.
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Systems that help AI models access and use specific, up-to-date information when generating responses.
- Workflow Automation: Ways to easily string together different AI tasks and other processes.
Lila: “Okay, John, you lost me a bit there with ‘foundation models,’ ‘agent orchestration,’ and ‘RAG’!”
John: “No worries, Lila! Let’s break them down:
- Foundation Models: These are very large, powerful AI models (like the LLMs we talked about) that are trained on a huge amount of general data. They form the ‘foundation’ that can then be adapted for many different specific tasks. Think of them as a very smart, general-purpose engine that you can then put into different types of vehicles.
- Agent Orchestration: Imagine you have several different AI helpers (agents), each good at a specific thing. ‘Orchestration’ is like having a conductor for an orchestra. The conductor (the orchestration tool) makes sure all the different AI ‘musicians’ work together smoothly and at the right times to complete a complex job.
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): This is a clever one! Imagine an AI trying to answer your question. Instead of only using the general knowledge it was trained on (which might be a bit old), RAG is like giving the AI a specific, up-to-date document or database to read right before it answers. This helps it ‘retrieve’ fresh information to ‘augment’ (or improve) its answer, making it more accurate and relevant. It’s like an open-book exam for the AI!
Does that help?”
Lila: “Yes, much better! So, other cloud companies like Microsoft (with Azure) and Google Cloud are already offering these kinds of advanced toolkits?”
John: “That’s right. They’ve been investing heavily in things like Microsoft’s Copilot Studio and Google’s Vertex AI Agent Builder, which provide these more complete, user-friendly environments. Some experts feel Bedrock has positioned itself more as a ‘model marketplace’ – a place to get the AI brains – rather than a full platform for building and managing complex AI applications.”
Late to the “Open-Source Agents” Party?
Another area where AWS might be playing catch-up is with something called “open-source agent development frameworks.”
Lila: “Whoa, ‘open-source agent development frameworks’? That’s a mouthful! What does that mean?”
John: “It is a bit of a mouthful, isn’t it? Let’s break it down:
- Open-source: This means the original code for the software is freely available. Anyone can see it, use it, and even suggest improvements. It’s like a community recipe that everyone can share and tweak.
- Agent Development Framework: This is a set of tools, libraries, and guidelines that helps developers build those AI ‘agents’ we talked about more easily. It’s like a pre-packaged kit with instructions for building sophisticated AI helpers.
So, an ‘open-source agent development framework’ is basically a publicly available toolkit for building AI agents. These have become super popular with developers.”
Amazon did release something called Strands Agents, which is an open-source AI Agents SDK. However, competitors like Google and Microsoft released their similar tools earlier, and those tools are already quite popular and well-integrated into their main AI platforms.
Lila: “Okay, I think I get ‘open-source agent development framework.’ But what’s an ‘SDK’?”
John: “Good catch! SDK stands for Software Development Kit. It’s a collection of tools, code libraries, and documentation that developers use to build applications for a specific platform or system. So, Strands Agents SDK is a toolkit specifically for building AI agents using Amazon’s approach.”
A key issue highlighted by experts is that Strands Agents isn’t deeply built into Bedrock itself. Developers want these tools to work seamlessly together in one place. One expert, Dion Hinchcliffe, said that customers feel Strands Agents is “stranded” because it’s not integrated, forcing them to manually connect things. This goes against the promise of Bedrock being an easy-to-use, managed service.
What’s Amazon Planning? Whispers of a Big Update
The good news is that AWS seems to be listening! According to Hinchcliffe, AWS has been “quietly preparing a major uplift of Bedrock.” The goal of this reported revamp is to make Bedrock much better at handling AI agents, make it more RAG-friendly (remember our open-book exam analogy?), and offer more flexible pricing.
He mentioned focusing on things like “managed agent hosting” (AWS takes care of running the agents), “deeper memory or state support” (so agents can remember more from past interactions), and “tunable orchestration” (more control over how different AI models and agents work together).
Lila: “What does ‘agent-native’ mean, John? And what’s the difference between ‘just inference’ and ‘intelligent automation’?”
John: “Great questions for understanding the shift!
- Agent-native: This means the platform (Bedrock, in this case) would be designed from the ground up to support and manage AI agents really well. It’s not just an add-on; it’s a core part of how it works.
- ‘Just inference’ vs. ‘intelligent automation’: ‘Inference’ in AI is the process where a trained model takes new input (like your question) and produces an output (like an answer). So, ‘just inference’ might mean Bedrock is mainly seen as a place to get these answers from models. ‘Intelligent automation,’ on the other hand, is much broader. It means using AI to automate complex tasks and workflows, where agents can make decisions, interact with other systems, and get things done. The goal is to move Bedrock from just providing AI answers to enabling these more complex automations.
”
Does Bedrock *Really* Need a Huge Makeover?
Interestingly, experts have different opinions on whether a massive revamp is truly needed.
Some, like Eric Miller from ClearScale, suggest that customers might not be asking for Bedrock itself to be completely overhauled. Instead, they might just want a new, separate AWS service that makes it easy to run those popular open-source agent development frameworks (like AutoGen or CrewAI) without having to manage their own servers (which are often called EC2 instances on AWS).
Lila: “What are ‘EC2 instances,’ John? And what does it mean to be ‘cloud native’?”
John: “Okay, so EC2 instances are basically virtual computers that you can rent from AWS in their cloud. If customers want to run software like AutoGen now, they have to set up these virtual computers, manage them, make sure they’re the right size, and keep them updated. It’s a bit of manual work.
‘Cloud native‘ generally means designing and running applications to take full advantage of cloud computing services. A big part of this is often using ‘managed services’ where the cloud provider (like AWS) handles a lot of the underlying infrastructure management – like server provisioning, scaling, and maintenance – so developers can just focus on building their application. Customers want to just ‘turn something on’ in the AWS console and start building, paying for what they use, without worrying about the servers underneath.”
Miller compares this potential moment for Bedrock to a past shift AWS made. Years ago, AWS had a service called Elastic Container Service (ECS). But customers increasingly wanted to use another popular open-source technology called Kubernetes. So, AWS adapted and launched Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), which became hugely successful because it gave customers what they were asking for. He suggests that if AWS launches a simple, ‘turnkey’ service for these agent frameworks, it could be a similar big win.
However, other experts, like Derek Ashmore, believe AWS does need to clarify its overall AI strategy. He points out that the relationship between all of Amazon’s different AI tools – Strands Agents, Bedrock, Amazon Q (an AI assistant for work), and SageMaker (a more general machine learning platform) – isn’t very clear. A revamp could bring these together into a more cohesive, developer-friendly package.
He also warns that AWS needs to act fast, as businesses are already looking for, and even building, alternatives that offer these integrated capabilities. For example, Miller’s own company, ClearScale, has built a tool on top of Bedrock to add some of these missing agent features.
My Thoughts on All This
John: “Phew, that was a lot to unpack! It’s clear that the world of generative AI is moving at lightning speed. What companies want today might be different from what they wanted even six months ago. It seems Amazon is listening closely to its customers, which is always a good sign. Making Bedrock more user-friendly for building these complex AI agents and integrating popular open-source tools sounds like a smart move to stay competitive. It’s a bit like when smartphones first came out – they were cool, but then app stores and easier development tools made them truly revolutionary. We might be seeing a similar evolution for enterprise AI platforms.”
Lila: “From my side, as someone still learning about all this, it’s fascinating to see how much thought goes into making these powerful AI tools easier for people and businesses to actually use. It’s not just about having the smartest AI; it’s about making that smartness accessible and useful for solving real problems. I’m curious to see what Amazon comes up with for Bedrock!”
This article is based on the following original source, summarized from the author’s perspective:
Amazon Bedrock faces revamp pressure amid rising enterprise
demands