C++ Static Analysis: Parasoft C/C++test Deep Dive

Safer code matters! Discover Parasoft C/C++test, the AI-powered static analysis tool that helps you write secure C++ code.#Parasoft #StaticAnalysis #Cplusplus
“`

Table of Contents

Explanation in video

Decoding Parasoft C/C++test: A Deep Dive into C++ Static Analysis with an AI Twist

John: Welcome, everyone, to our latest tech breakdown. Today, we’re delving into a crucial area for software development, particularly for those working with C and C++: automated testing and static analysis. Specifically, we’ll be looking at Parasoft C/C++test and its evolving capabilities, including some exciting new AI integrations. It’s all about writing safer, more secure, and higher-quality code.

Lila: Thanks, John! I’m excited to learn. So, for beginners like me, or maybe developers coming from other languages, could you start with the basics? What exactly is C++, why is it still so relevant, and what does “static analysis” mean in this context?

Basic Info: Understanding C++, Static Analysis, and Parasoft C/C++test

John: Excellent questions, Lila. Let’s break it down. C++ is a high-performance, general-purpose programming language. It was developed as an extension of the C language, adding object-oriented features, exception handling, and a rich standard library. Its relevance today, decades after its inception, stems from its power and flexibility. You’ll find C++ in operating systems, game engines, embedded systems (like in cars or medical devices), high-frequency trading platforms, and large-scale enterprise applications where performance and control over hardware are paramount.

Lila: So, it’s chosen when you really need speed and direct memory management, right? But I’ve heard that also makes it more complex and prone to certain types of errors compared to, say, Python or Java.

John: Precisely. That control comes with responsibility. Memory management, pointer arithmetic, and undefined behaviors can lead to bugs like memory leaks, buffer overflows, or segmentation faults if not handled carefully. This is where static analysis comes into play. Static analysis, in simple terms, is the process of analyzing source code *without* actually executing it (hence “static,” as opposed to “dynamic” analysis which runs the code). Think of it as an automated code review. Tools scan your C++ code for potential errors, vulnerabilities, and deviations from coding standards.

Lila: Okay, so it’s like having a super-diligent proofreader for your code that checks for common mistakes and bad practices *before* you even try to run it? What kind of things can it find?

John: Exactly. It can find a wide range of issues:

Potential bugs: Null pointer dereferences, uninitialized variables, resource leaks, division by zero.
Security vulnerabilities: Buffer overflows, SQL injection (though less common directly in C++ core, it can be in how C++ interacts with other systems), format string vulnerabilities.
Coding standard violations: Ensuring code adheres to specific guidelines like MISRA C/C++ (Motor Industry Software Reliability Association), CERT C/C++ (Computer Emergency Response Team coding standards for secure coding), or AUTOSAR (Automotive Open System Architecture).
Code smells: Sections of code that aren’t necessarily buggy but indicate deeper design problems, like overly complex functions or duplicated code.

And this brings us to Parasoft C/C++test. It’s a comprehensive automated software testing solution specifically designed for C and C++ developers. It provides robust static analysis capabilities, but also unit testing, code coverage analysis, and requirements traceability, all aimed at improving software quality and security, and ensuring compliance with various industry standards. It’s a powerful tool in a C++ developer’s arsenal to combat those complexities we talked about.

Lila: That sounds incredibly useful, especially for critical systems where a bug could have serious consequences. You mentioned a new release, Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1. What’s new and exciting there?

Supply Details: Unpacking Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1

John: Yes, Parasoft recently announced Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1, and it brings some significant enhancements. One of the headline features, as highlighted in recent announcements, is a new AI assistant. This isn’t about AI writing your code from scratch, but rather about making the testing tool itself more accessible and efficient. The AI assistant helps developers quickly find information within Parasoft’s product documentation and user manuals. If a developer has a question about how to configure a specific test or understand a particular static analysis warning, they can ask the AI assistant in natural language.

Lila: So, it’s like an intelligent search or a chatbot specifically for the Parasoft tool? That could really speed up the learning curve for new users, or even help experienced users find niche information faster!

John: Exactly. The goal is to boost developer productivity and reduce the time and effort spent on training and troubleshooting. This AI assistant complements another Parasoft AI feature, the Parasoft GenAI agent, which integrates with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code. That agent can actually help *fix* static analysis violations by suggesting code changes, using a Large Language Model (LLM) provider of the user’s choice, such as OpenAI or Azure OpenAI.

Lila: Wow, suggesting fixes directly in the editor sounds like a game-changer! What else is packed into this 2025.1 release?

John: There’s a strong focus on security. The update significantly expands its Static Application Security Testing (SAST) capabilities by adding nearly 70 new static analysis rules. These new rules are specifically targeted at identifying Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs). CWEs are a community-developed list of common software and hardware weakness types that have security ramifications. By identifying these early, you can prevent critical vulnerabilities like memory corruption and logic flaws, which are much more costly and difficult to fix later in the development lifecycle or, worse, in production.

Lila: “Nearly 70 new rules” – that’s a lot! It sounds like they’re really trying to cover all bases for security. What are CWEs exactly? Are they like specific patterns of bad code?

John: Think of CWEs as categories of errors. For example, CWE-121 is “Stack-based Buffer Overflow,” CWE-476 is “NULL Pointer Dereference,” and CWE-78 is “Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (‘OS Command Injection’).” The new rules in Parasoft C/C++test help detect code patterns that could lead to these weaknesses. This enhanced coverage is particularly important for compliance with security standards like ISO 21434 (Road vehicles – Cybersecurity engineering) and IEC 62304 (Medical device software – Software life cycle processes).

Lila: That makes sense. Adhering to standards is a big deal in many industries. You mentioned MISRA earlier. Any updates there?

John: Yes, indeed. Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 now offers complete support for the MISRA C:2025 coding guidelines. This is the latest iteration of the MISRA C standard, which is crucial for safety-critical systems, especially in the automotive sector but increasingly adopted elsewhere. The tool also updates rules for MISRA C:2023, removing obsolete rules and offering functional safety improvements. This commitment to supporting the latest standards is vital for development teams working in regulated environments.

Lila: What about developers who are migrating between coding standards, or using multiple standards? That must get complicated with warnings.

John: Parasoft has addressed that too. There’s a new test configuration option that allows teams to automatically suppress violations of equivalent rules. Imagine you’re transitioning from an older standard to MISRA C:2025. A particular coding issue might have been flagged under one rule ID in the old standard and a different ID in the new one. Previously, developers might have had to manually re-suppress these already-addressed violations. Now, the tool can recognize these equivalencies, which is a significant time-saver and reduces “warning fatigue.”

Lila: That’s a smart feature! Little things like that can make a big difference in daily workflow. Any other notable improvements in 2025.1?

John: They’ve also expanded compiler support. This is important because C++ code needs to be compiled for specific hardware and operating systems. The new release includes support for new versions of ARM Compiler, Clang C/C++ Compiler, GNU GCC (a very popular open-source compiler), Hexagon Clang Compiler (often used in DSPs and embedded systems), and Intel Classic C/C++ Compiler. Broader compiler support means more development teams can integrate Parasoft C/C++test seamlessly into their existing toolchains.

Technical Mechanism: How Does It All Work?

Lila: Okay, John, this is fascinating. We’ve talked about what static analysis *does* and what Parasoft C/C++test offers. But can you give us a peek under the hood? How does a tool like this actually analyze code without running it? And how does the AI fit into this technical process?

John: Certainly. The core of static analysis involves several steps. First, the tool needs to parse the source code. This is similar to what a compiler does; it breaks down the code into its fundamental components like keywords, variables, functions, and expressions, and builds an internal representation, often an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST). The AST is a tree-like structure that represents the syntactic structure of the code.

Lila: So it first needs to understand the grammar and structure of the C++ code, just like understanding sentence structure in English?

John: Precisely. Once it has this AST, and often other representations like control flow graphs (which map the possible execution paths through a function) and data flow graphs (which track how data moves and is modified), the static analysis engine can start its work. It applies a set of pre-defined rules or checkers to these representations. Each rule is designed to detect a specific type of potential defect or a violation of a coding standard.

For example, a rule for detecting uninitialized variables would traverse the control flow graph to see if there’s any path where a variable is used before it’s assigned a value. A rule for MISRA compliance might check if pointer arithmetic conforms to specific constraints, or if certain risky language features are avoided.

Lila: And these are the “nearly 70 new static analysis rules” for CWEs you mentioned earlier? So, Parasoft is constantly adding more of these sophisticated checkers?

John: Correct. These rules can range from simple pattern matching to very complex inter-procedural analysis (analyzing interactions between different functions or modules) and even path-sensitive analysis (analyzing different outcomes based on different execution paths). The more sophisticated the analysis, the more accurate it can be, but also potentially the more computationally intensive. Parasoft C/C++test aims for a good balance, providing deep analysis while integrating into the developer’s workflow without excessive slowdowns. It performs static analysis and unit testing for C/C++ code, often in an integrated development environment (IDE) or as part of a continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline.

Lila: Now, about the AI. You mentioned the AI assistant for documentation and the GenAI agent for fixing violations. How do these integrate technically? Is the AI itself analyzing the code in a new way, or is it working on top of the traditional static analysis results?

John: That’s a key distinction. In the context of Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1, the AI, particularly the Large Language Models, isn’t (yet) fundamentally replacing the core static analysis engine’s rule-based logic for *finding* the violations. The core engine still uses its meticulously crafted parsers and checkers to identify potential issues based on established programming principles and standards.
Where the AI comes in is:

For the AI Assistant: This is about natural language processing and information retrieval. The AI is trained on Parasoft’s documentation. When you ask a question, it uses its understanding of language to find the most relevant sections of the documentation and present them to you. It’s making the existing knowledge base more accessible.
For the GenAI Agent (fixing violations): This is more advanced. When the static analysis engine flags a violation (e.g., a potential null pointer dereference or a MISRA rule breach), that information, along with the relevant code snippet and the rule description, can be fed to an LLM. The LLM, trained on vast amounts of code, can then *suggest* a corrected version of the code. It’s pattern recognition and generation on a massive scale. The developer still needs to review and approve the suggestion, of course.

So, the AI is augmenting the process – making it easier to understand the tool and easier to act on the findings of the traditional static analysis engine.

Lila: That makes sense. The AI isn’t finding new *types* of bugs that the rules miss, but it’s helping humans deal with the output more effectively and efficiently. Is there potential for AI to get more involved in the actual detection process in the future?

John: Absolutely. That’s an active area of research. AI, particularly machine learning, could potentially learn patterns from vast codebases to identify anomalies that don’t fit explicit, pre-programmed rules. It might detect more subtle bugs or security vulnerabilities. However, there are challenges, such as the need for very large, high-quality datasets for training, and the “explainability” of AI-found issues – developers need to understand *why* something is flagged. For now, the combination of robust, rule-based static analysis with AI-powered assistance and remediation seems to be the sweet spot Parasoft is targeting.

Team & Community: Behind Parasoft and the C++ Ecosystem

Lila: This is all very impressive technology. Who is Parasoft, the company behind C/C++test? And what about the broader community around C++ and tools like this?

John: Parasoft is a well-established company in the software testing space. They’ve been around for over 30 years, specializing in automated software testing and quality solutions. They offer a suite of tools for various languages and testing types, not just C/C++. Their focus has always been on helping organizations deliver high-quality, secure, and compliant software. So, C/C++test is one of their flagship products, built on decades of expertise in static analysis, unit testing, and embedded systems, where C and C++ are prevalent.

Lila: So they have a long track record. Does Parasoft engage with the C++ community? For example, with standards bodies or open-source initiatives?

John: Yes, companies like Parasoft typically engage quite actively. Supporting standards like MISRA C/C++, CERT C/C++, AUTOSAR, and CWEs requires them to stay abreast of, and sometimes contribute to, the evolution of these standards. They often participate in industry working groups and conferences. The fact that Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 provides “full MISRA C:2025 support” and updates for MISRA C:2023 indicates their commitment to keeping pace with these important community-driven efforts. They also have user forums, like the “Parasoft Forums” mentioned in some search results, where users can discuss the tool, ask questions, and share solutions. This is a common way for tool vendors to foster a community around their products.

Lila: What about the general C++ developer community? How do they typically view and use static analysis tools? Is it a standard part of most C++ workflows now?

John: The adoption of static analysis in the C++ world has grown significantly. In safety-critical domains like automotive, aerospace, and medical devices, it’s often mandatory due to regulatory requirements. In other areas, like game development or high-performance computing, its adoption is driven by the desire to catch bugs early, improve code maintainability, and reduce development costs.
Many C++ developers, especially experienced ones, recognize the value of these tools in taming the language’s complexity. Modern development practices like DevOps and CI/CD have also accelerated adoption, as static analysis can be easily integrated into automated build and test pipelines. However, there can sometimes be resistance – perhaps due to concerns about “false positives” (warnings that aren’t actual issues) or the time it takes to configure and act on the results. That’s why usability features, like Parasoft’s new AI assistant or the suppression of equivalent rules, are so important.

Lila: So, it’s about making the tools not just powerful, but also practical and developer-friendly. Does Parasoft offer resources for learning and support beyond the AI assistant?

John: Absolutely. Companies like Parasoft invest heavily in resources. This includes extensive documentation (which the AI assistant now helps navigate), tutorials, white papers, webinars, and technical support. The “Parasoft Resources” page on their website, for instance, likely contains a wealth of information for users looking to perform static analysis and unit testing for C/C++ code. Their forums also serve as a community support channel.

Use-Cases & Future Outlook

Lila: We’ve touched on some applications, like automotive and medical devices. Where else is Parasoft C/C++test making a significant impact? And what does the future look like for this kind of technology?

John: The use-cases are quite broad, essentially anywhere C or C++ is used for developing critical or complex software.

Embedded Systems: Beyond automotive and medical, this includes industrial control systems, consumer electronics, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices. Here, reliability and security are paramount, and adherence to standards like MISRA is common.
Aerospace and Defense: Similar to automotive, these sectors have stringent safety and security requirements. Static analysis is crucial for compliance with standards like DO-178C.
Telecommunications: Network infrastructure relies heavily on C/C++ for performance and stability.
Financial Services: For high-frequency trading platforms and core banking systems, performance and correctness are critical.
Operating Systems and Compilers: The foundational software that everything else runs on.

Essentially, any project where software failure can lead to significant financial loss, safety risks, or security breaches benefits immensely from rigorous static analysis and testing. Parasoft C/C++test helps these teams accelerate the path to “safer, more secure, and higher quality software while reducing real-world failures and compliance challenges,” as their recent announcements put it.

Lila: That’s a wide range of critical applications! Looking ahead, what are the big trends for tools like Parasoft C/C++test? More AI, I presume?

John: More AI, certainly, and deeper integration of it. I expect we’ll see AI not just assisting with documentation or suggesting fixes, but perhaps becoming more involved in prioritizing warnings, predicting defect-prone areas of code based on historical data, or even generating more comprehensive unit tests.
Another trend is the continued emphasis on security (SAST). As software becomes more interconnected, the attack surface grows. Tools will continue to add more rules for detecting vulnerabilities like those listed in CWEs, and support for emerging security standards.
Cloud integration is also key. Many development teams are moving their toolchains to the cloud, so static analysis tools need to integrate seamlessly with cloud-based CI/CD platforms and provide scalable analysis capabilities.
Finally, an ongoing focus will be on usability and developer experience. The easier and more intuitive these tools are, and the better they integrate into developer workflows (like in the IDE), the more effective they will be. Reducing false positives and making results actionable are constant goals.

Lila: It sounds like the aim is to make these powerful tools almost invisible, or at least a very natural part of the development process, constantly working in the background to help developers write better code without being intrusive.

John: That’s a great way to put it, Lila. The ideal is an intelligent assistant that flags real problems early, helps you fix them quickly, and ensures your code meets the necessary quality and safety standards, all without bogging you down. The evolution of Parasoft C/C++test, particularly with features like the AI assistant and enhanced rule sets in version 2025.1, points directly towards that future.

Competitor Comparison: The Static Analysis Landscape

Lila: John, Parasoft C/C++test sounds very comprehensive. But I imagine they’re not the only ones offering static analysis for C++. What does the competitive landscape look like? And what makes Parasoft stand out?

John: You’re right, Lila, it’s a competitive field. There are several other well-regarded static analysis tools for C and C++. Some notable ones include:

SonarQube (with SonarCSource C/C++ Analyzer): Very popular for continuous code quality, offering broad language support including C++.
Coverity by Synopsys: A long-standing, powerful static analysis tool, especially strong in large, complex C/C++ codebases.
Klocwork by Perforce: Another strong contender, often used in safety-critical and security-conscious industries.
Helix QAC (formerly PRQA QA·C and QA·C++): Known for its deep analysis and strict adherence to coding standards like MISRA.
PC-lint Plus: A widely used and cost-effective linting tool that performs thorough static analysis.
Clang Static Analyzer: An open-source tool built into the Clang compiler infrastructure, offering good analysis capabilities.

Many Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) also come with some built-in static analysis capabilities.

Lila: That’s quite a list! So, with all these options, how does a development team choose? What are Parasoft C/C++test’s key differentiators?

John: Choosing often comes down to specific needs, existing toolchains, budget, and the level of support required. Parasoft C/C++test aims to differentiate itself through several key areas:

Breadth of Testing Capabilities: It’s not just static analysis. Parasoft offers a “unified C and C++ test automation solution,” encompassing static analysis, unit testing generation and execution, structural code coverage, and requirements traceability. This integrated approach can be very appealing.
Focus on Compliance and Safety-Critical Standards: Parasoft has a strong emphasis on helping organizations meet stringent industry standards like MISRA, AUTOSAR, CERT C/C++, DO-178C, ISO 26262, IEC 62304, and now full support for MISRA C:2025. Their tools are often certified for use in safety-critical development.
AI-Driven Productivity Enhancements: The new AI assistant for documentation navigation and the GenAI agent for suggesting fixes are innovative features aimed at improving developer productivity and usability, which can be a significant differentiator.
Deep Security Coverage: The addition of “nearly 70 new static analysis rules for CWEs” in the 2025.1 release underscores their commitment to robust SAST capabilities.
Integration and Toolchain Support: Extensive compiler support and integration with popular IDEs and CI/CD systems are crucial for adoption.
Customer Support and Expertise: As an established company, Parasoft typically offers robust customer support and professional services, which can be vital for complex deployments.

Ultimately, teams often evaluate tools based on pilot projects to see which best fits their specific C++ development environment and quality objectives.

Risks & Cautions

Lila: Using a tool like Parasoft C/C++test sounds like a clear win for improving code quality. But are there any risks or cautions developers should be aware of when implementing static analysis in general, or with this tool specifically?

John: That’s a good point. While immensely beneficial, static analysis isn’t a silver bullet, and there are considerations:

False Positives: Static analysis tools can sometimes flag issues that aren’t actual errors in the specific context of the code. Too many false positives can lead to “warning fatigue,” where developers start ignoring warnings. Good tools, like Parasoft C/C++test, offer ways to configure rule sets, suppress specific warnings (with justification), and tune the analysis to minimize this. The new feature to suppress equivalent rules across standards is an example of addressing this.
False Negatives: No static analysis tool can find every single bug. Some errors might only manifest at runtime or under very specific conditions that are hard for static analysis to predict. It’s a powerful aid, not a complete replacement for other forms of testing (like dynamic analysis, integration testing, system testing) and careful code reviews.
Initial Setup and Configuration: Integrating a comprehensive static analysis tool into an existing, large codebase can require significant initial effort to configure build environments, select appropriate rule sets, and deal with the initial flood of warnings from legacy code.
Over-reliance: Developers shouldn’t become complacent and assume the tool will catch everything. Good coding practices, understanding the language deeply, and thorough human review remain essential.
Learning Curve: While tools are becoming more user-friendly, particularly with AI assistants, there’s still a learning curve to understand the tool’s capabilities, interpret its findings, and effectively manage the results.
Performance: Deep static analysis can be computationally intensive and might slow down build times if not managed properly, for example, by running full analysis less frequently than lighter checks.

Parasoft continuously works on mitigating these. For instance, the “AI assistant” aims to reduce the learning curve, and improved rule precision helps reduce false positives. It’s about finding the right balance and integrating the tool thoughtfully into the development lifecycle.

Lila: So, it’s important to approach it with realistic expectations and a plan for integration and management, rather than just flipping a switch and expecting magic.

John: Precisely. It’s a powerful instrument that, when wielded skillfully, dramatically improves the quality and security of C++ software. But skill and thoughtful application are key.

Expert Opinions / Analyses (Integrated throughout dialogue)

John: As we’ve discussed, the consensus among software engineering experts is that static analysis is a best practice, especially for C and C++. The complexities of these languages, particularly around memory management and pointers, make them prime candidates for automated checks. The move by Parasoft to integrate AI for usability and remediation reflects a broader industry trend towards making developer tools smarter and more assistive. The emphasis in Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 on standards compliance like MISRA C:2025 and comprehensive CWE coverage is well-aligned with the increasing demands for software safety and security in critical systems. Analysts often point to the ROI (Return on Investment) of static analysis, as finding and fixing bugs early in the development cycle is significantly cheaper than dealing with them in later stages or after release.

Lila: So, the experts generally agree: tools like this are essential for modern, high-stakes C++ development, and innovations like AI assistance are welcome improvements.

Latest News & Roadmap (Covered by Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 details)

John: Indeed. And as we’ve detailed, the latest news is very much centered around the Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 release. Key takeaways are:

The introduction of the AI assistant for easier access to documentation and user manuals.
The complementary Parasoft GenAI agent for VS Code to help fix static analysis violations.
Expanded SAST capabilities with nearly 70 new static analysis rules targeting CWEs.
Full support for MISRA C:2025 and updated rules for MISRA C:2023.
A new test configuration option to automatically suppress violations of equivalent rules when working with multiple coding standards.
Expanded compiler support for ARM, Clang, GCC, Hexagon, and Intel compilers.

This release clearly indicates Parasoft’s roadmap: deeper AI integration for productivity, enhanced security testing, and unwavering support for the latest industry standards. The aim is to accelerate the delivery of “safer, more secure, and higher quality software.”

Lila: It’s good to see a clear direction and continuous improvement, especially with something as foundational as a testing tool.

FAQ: Your Questions Answered

Lila: John, this has been incredibly insightful. Perhaps we could summarize some key points in an FAQ format for readers who want a quick overview?

John: Excellent idea, Lila. Let’s cover some common questions.

Lila: Q1: What is Parasoft C/C++test primarily used for?

John: A1: Parasoft C/C++test is a comprehensive automated software testing solution for C and C++ developers. Its primary uses include:

Static Analysis: Analyzing source code without execution to find potential bugs, security vulnerabilities (like CWEs), and violations of coding standards (like MISRA, CERT C/C++).
Unit Testing: Automating the creation, execution, and management of unit tests to verify the functionality of individual code components.
Code Coverage Analysis: Measuring the extent to which the source code is executed during testing, helping to identify untested parts.
Requirements Traceability: Linking software requirements to tests and code to ensure all requirements are covered and validated.
Compliance Enforcement: Helping development teams adhere to industry-specific safety and security standards.

Lila: Q2: What is “static analysis” and why is it important for C++?

John: A2: Static analysis is the process of examining source code before it is run (statically) to detect potential issues. It’s particularly important for C++ due to the language’s power and complexity, which can lead to errors like memory leaks, buffer overflows, and null pointer dereferences if not managed carefully. Static analysis tools automate the detection of these and other issues, improving code quality, security, and maintainability early in the development lifecycle.

Lila: Q3: What are the key new features in Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1?

John: A3: The Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 release brings several key enhancements:

An AI assistant to help users navigate product documentation and manuals.
Nearly 70 new static analysis rules targeting Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) for improved security.
Full support for MISRA C:2025 coding guidelines and updates for MISRA C:2023.
An option to auto-suppress equivalent rule violations across different coding standards.
Expanded compiler support.

Lila: Q4: How does the AI in Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 help developers?

John: A4: The AI in Parasoft C/C++test 2025.1 primarily aims to improve developer productivity and usability. The AI assistant allows developers to ask task-focused questions in natural language to quickly find information in the extensive product documentation. This reduces the learning curve and speeds up problem-solving. It complements the Parasoft GenAI agent (for VS Code) which can suggest fixes for static analysis violations, leveraging Large Language Models.

Lila: Q5: Does Parasoft C/C++test support industry standards for safety and security?

John: A5: Yes, comprehensively. Parasoft C/C++test provides robust support for a wide range of industry standards, including MISRA C/C++ (with full support for the latest MISRA C:2025), CERT C/C++, AUTOSAR, CWE, ISO 26262, IEC 62304, DO-178C, and others. This makes it a suitable tool for developing software in safety-critical and security-conscious industries like automotive, aerospace, medical devices, and industrial automation.

Our Mission

Design. Strategy. Brand.

About Us